Journal of Management and Business Education🔗




English Full Article Citation


Enrique Bigné , Universitat de València, Spain
Alberto Badenes-Rocha, Universitat de València, Spain
Carla Ruiz , Universitat de València, Spain
Luisa Andreu , Universitat de València, Spain


In this study, we outline the different steps and strategies followed to develop an online formation program aimed to higher education teachers. The aim of this program is to provide with teaching competencies to face the challenges of the next decade’s classroom, with a special focus on the role of digital technology in learning environments, through a combination of a self-managed course with a guided on-site training with real cases. A multicultural, multidisciplinary team conceives this blended learning format, which applies a storytelling approach for content generation and communication. A detailed description of the different factors and stages followed to undertake the project is presented, together with a series of recommendations to face similar activities in the applied teaching and educational innovation field. Specifically, the importance of an appropriate project design, management and timing is stressed. In this way, we contribute with the diffusion of an innovative, hybrid program to develop digital competences in higher education practitioners and a selection of criteria to undertake other supranational projects that count on a wide reach and follow a didactical approach.

higher education, teacher education, blended learning, digital competences

7 June 2019

20 July 2019

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.


Bigné, E.; Badenes-Rocha, A.; Ruiz, C.; & Andreu, L. (2019). Development of a blended course for online teaching: process and outcomes. Journal of Management and Business Education, 2(2), 108-126.


Alshahrani, S., Ahmed, E., and Ward, R. (2017). “The influence of online resources on student–lecturer relationship in higher education: a comparison study”, Journal of Computers in Education, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 87-106.

Avidov-Ungar, O. and Forkosh-Baruch, A. (2018). “Professional identity of teacher educators in the digital era in light of demands of pedagogical innovation”, Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 73, pp. 183-191.

Bigné, E., Badenes, A., Ruiz, C., & Andreu, L. (2018). Virtual classroom: teacher skills to promote student engagement. Journal of Management and Business Education, 1(2), 87-105.

Christopher, D. and Hyder, K. (2014). The successful virtual classroom: How to design and facilitate interactive and engaging live online learning. Amacom, New York, NY.

Cochran-Smith, M. and Villegas, A. M. (2015). “Framing teacher preparation research: An overview of the field, part 1”, Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 66 No. 1, pp. 7-20.

Dolot, A. (2018). “The characteristics of Generation Z”, E-Mentor, Vol. 74, No. 2, pp. 44-52.

European Commission (2019). “Erasmus + Programme Guide”. Retrieved on March 8, 2019 from

Gil-Jaurena, I. and Domínguez, D. (2018). “Teachers’ roles in light of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Evolution and challenges in higher distance education”, International Review of Education, Vol. 64, No. 2, pp. 197-219.

Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R. and Graham, C. R. (2015). “Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review”, Computers & Education, Vol. 90, pp. 36-53.

Stanford University IT (2017). “Monthly Video Conferencing Participants Doubled Over Past Year”. Retrieved on March 11, 2018 from

INTEF (2017). “Common Digital Competence Framework for Teachers. October 2017”. Retrieved on March 12, 2019 from

Kalolo, J. F. (2019). “Digital revolution and its impact on education systems in developing countries”, Education and Information Technologies, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 345-358.

Kaplan, A. M. and Haenlein, M. (2016). “Higher education and the digital revolution: About MOOCs, SPOCs, social media, and the Cookie Monster”, Business Horizons, Vol. 59, No. 4, pp. 441-450.

Lai, K. W. and Hong, K. S. (2015). “Technology use and learning characteristics of students in higher education: Do generational differences exist?”, British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 46 No. 4, pp. 725-738.

Lakhal, S. and Khechine, H. (2016). “Student intention to use desktop web-conferencing according to course delivery modes in higher education”, The International Journal of Management Education, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 146-160.

Lee, K. (2018). “Implementing computer‐mediated intercultural communication in English education: A critical reflection on its pedagogical challenges”, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 34 No. 6, pp. 673-687.

Li, C. R., Lin, C. J., Tien, Y. H. and Chen, C. M. (2017). “A multilevel model of team cultural diversity and creativity: The role of climate for inclusion”, The Journal of Creative Behavior, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 163-179.

McCutcheon, K., Lohan, M., Traynor, M. and Martin, D. (2015). “A systematic review evaluating the impact of online or blended learning vs. face‐to‐face learning of clinical skills in undergraduate nurse education”, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 71, No. 2, pp. 255-270.

Medrano, N., Mosquera, A. & Melón, A. (2018). Análisis del efecto del uso de herramientas multimedia. Journal of Management and Business Education, 1(3), 210-225.

Niemi, H. and Multisilta, J. (2016). “Digital storytelling promoting twenty-first century skills and student engagement”, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 451-468.

Paul, A. K. and Adaeze, O. B. (2018). “Bridging the digital divide: the relevance of Marshall McLuhan’s media ecology theory” British Journal of Education, Vol. 6, No. 6, pp. 23-28.

Phan, T., McNeil, S. G. and Robin, B. R. (2016). “Students’ patterns of engagement and course performance in a Massive Open Online Course”, Computers & Education, Vol. 95, pp. 36-44.

Pineda Hoyos, J. E., Cano, T. and Hernando, L. (2016). “E-moderating and e-tivities: the implementation of a workshop to develop online teaching skills in in-service teachers”, Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 97-114.

Planas-Lladó, A., Feliu, L., Castro, F., Fraguell, R. M., Arbat, G., Pujol, J., ... and Daunis-i-Estadella, P. (2018). “Using peer assessment to evaluate teamwork from a multidisciplinary perspective”, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 14-30.

Prensky, M. (2001). “Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1”, On the Horizon, Vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 1-6.

Sarıca, H. Ç. and Usluel, Y. K. (2016). “The effect of digital storytelling on visual memory and writing skills”, Computers & Education, Vol. 94, pp. 298-309.

Schwarz, B. B. and Asterhan, C. S. (2011). “E-moderation of synchronous discussions in educational settings: A nascent practice”, Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 395-442.

Shachaf, P. (2008). “Cultural diversity and information and communication technology impacts on global virtual teams: An exploratory study”, Information & Management, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 131-142.

Thomas, R. A., West, R. E. and Borup, J. (2017). “An analysis of instructor social presence in online text and asynchronous video feedback comments”, The Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 33, pp. 61-73.

Van Der Vegt, G. S. and Bunderson, J. S. (2005). “Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 532-547.

Wanner, T. and Palmer, E. (2015). “Personalising learning: Exploring student and teacher perceptions about flexible learning and assessment in a flipped university course”, Computers & Education, Vol. 88, pp. 354-369.

Wiedmer, T. (2015). “Generations do differ: Best practices in leading traditionalists, boomers, and generations X, Y, and Z”, Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, Vol. 82, No. 1, pp. 51-58.

Wharton Online (2019). “Wharton Online: Making World-Class Business Education Accessible to the World”. Retrieved on March 25, 2019 from

Wolff, C. E., van den Bogert, N., Jarodzka, H. and Boshuizen, H. P. (2015). “Keeping an eye on learning: Differences between expert and novice teachers’ representations of classroom management events”, Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 66, No. 1, pp. 68-85.